Friday, March 13, 2009

TABOR Passes From House After Third Reading

HJR 23, commonly known as TABOR (Taxpayers Bill of Rights),was passed out of the House on March 12 and will move to the Senate for consideration. If passed this constitutional amendment would create an appropriations and revenue growth lid for the state that would be the sum of inflation plus population growth. Both MSBA and MNEA have expressed very grave concerns over what TABOR could mean to funding of public education. (Please see earlier post for additional information on TABOR)

Superintendent Dr. Ridder, having experienced TABOR in Colorado, has expressed great concern over passage of this type of legislatilon as well.

The following is a list of the representatives (Springfield Reps. denoted in blue) and how they voted on TABOR:



THIRD READING OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION

HCS HJR 23, relating to limits on state appropriations, was taken up by Representative Icet.

On motion of Representative Icet, HCS HJR 23 was read the third time and passed by the following vote:

AYES: 082


Allen
Bivins
Brandom
Brown 30
Brown 149
Bruns
Burlison
Cooper
Cox
Cunningham
Davis
Day
Deeken
Denison
Dethrow
Dieckhaus
Diehl
Dixon
Dougherty
Dugger
Dusenberg
Emery
Ervin
Faith
Fisher 125
Flanigan
Flook
Franz
Funderburk
Gatschenberger
Grisamore
Guernsey
Hobbs
Hoskins 121
Icet
Jones 89
Jones 117
Keeney
Kingery
Koenig
Kraus
Lair
Largent
Leara
Lipke
Loehner
McGhee
McNary
Munzlinger
Nieves
Parkinson
Parson
Pratt
Riddle
Ruestman
Ruzicka
Sander
Sater
Schaaf
Schad
Scharnhorst
Schlottach
Schoeller
Self
Silvey
Smith 14
Smith 150
Stevenson
Stream
Sutherland
Thomson
Tilley
Tracy
Viebrock
Wasson
Wells
Wilson 119
Wilson 130
Wood
Yates
Zerr
Mr Speaker


NOES: 078

Atkins
Aull
Biermann
Bringer
Brown 50
Brown 73
Burnett
Calloway
Carter
Casey
Chappelle-Nadal
Colona
Corcoran
Curls
El-Amin
Englund
Fallert
Fischer 107
Frame
Grill
Guest
Harris
Hodges
Holsman
Hoskins 80
Hughes
Hummel
Jones 63
Kander
Kelly
Kirkton
Komo
Kratky
Kuessner
Lampe
LeBlanc
LeVota
Liese
Low
McClanahan
McDonald
McNeil
Meadows
Meiners
Molendorp
Morris
Nance
Nasheed
Norr
Oxford
Pace
Pollock
Quinn
Roorda
Rucker
Salva
Scavuzzo
Schieffer
Schoemehl
Schupp
Shively
Skaggs
Spreng
Storch
Swinger
Talboy
Todd
Vogt
Wallace
Walsh
Walton Gray
Webb
Webber
Wildberger
Witte
Wright
Yaeger
Zimmerman


PRESENT: 000


ABSENT WITH LEAVE: 003


Nolte
Still
Weter

NEA Legislative Update

The following is from Missouri National EducationAssociation

BUDGET

The House Budget Committee considered numerous amendments to the budget bills (HBs 1-12) Allen Icet. As noted previously, Budget Chair Allen Icet has inserted federal stimulus and stabilization funds into the elementary and secondary education budget bill (HB 2) and removed a total of roughly $900 million in general revenue from the budget process. Committee members are not allowed to consider this revenue in the budget process, so all amendments to increase must be accompanied by a like decrease. Rep. Sara Lampe offered an amendment to restore $5 million in professional development funding by reducing formula transportation funding. The amendment was defeated. Other amendments offered to restore funding for Parents as Teachers and the Scholars and Fine Arts Academies were also defeated.
The Association believes that the current House budget process is fundamentally flawed. Proper decisions for budgeting and balancing priorities can not be properly done without having all the available funding on the table for consideration. Missouri NEA supports incorporating federal economic stimulus and stabilization revenues into next year's budget in a careful way to maintain vital public services, while also seeking to address the structural budget deficit, improve the fairness of the state tax code and ensure adequate funding for public education and other vital public services.


PROTECTING MISSOURI'S FAIR AND IMPARTIAL COURTS
The Senate Governmental Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Committee will hear SJR 9 (Jim Lembke) on March 12. The SJR would revise Missouri's Non-Partisan Court Plan in a number of ways. Upon passage of this amendment, the terms of all members of the Appellate Judicial Commission and Circuit Judicial Commission would automatically expire. A new Governor could remove members of the commissions who were appointed by the previous Governor. These provisions will make the judicial selection process more political.
The SJR would also force all applicants to be publicly disclosed and require all interviews to be public meetings. This is likely to reduce the pool of qualified applicants, since clients or employers may be affected adversely by the knowledge that an attorney is considering applying for a court appointment.
The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan is essential for the state to select qualified judges in a way that limits partisan politics in the selection process. This non-partisan plan is so effective that a majority of states have adopted some version of the “Missouri Plan.” Fair and impartial courts are vital to democracy and the preservation of our rights, including the fundamental right of access to a great public school. The Association opposes the Joint Resolution and urges the General Assembly to refrain from any changes in the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan.


HOUSE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

In addition to hearing the scheduled bills on March 11, the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee voted out three bills as Consent Bills:
1) HB 922 (Joe Smith) to require school districts to adopt policies on allergy prevention and response, with priority given to addressing potentially deadly food-borne allergies.
2) HB 659 (Gary Dusenberg) to revise the laws regarding special administrative boards appointed for lapsed school districts. In part the bill sets up a structure for moving away from an unelected, administrative board and back to an elected board over time by electing new board members.
3) HCS/HB 304 (Rodney Schad) to specify what constitutes a significant difference in the time involved in transporting students for the purposes of elections to change school district boundaries.
The Committee was also scheduled to consider and vote on HB 387 (Robert Wayne Cooper), but the committee postponed the vote on the bill until after spring break. HB 387 creates a voluntary Quality Rating System for early child care facilities. Missouri NEA supports the bill.

SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE

The Senate Education Committee met on March 11 and heard three of the four scheduled bills, but the hearing for SB 373 (Rob Mayer) was postponed. SB 373 creates procedures for open enrollment of public school students across school district boundary lines.
The committee also voted out two bills:
1) SCS/SB 94 (Jolie Justus) to increase the eligibility limits on state child care subsidies. The Association strongly supports this effort to help low income, working parents model the value and dignity of work while making sure their children have access to quality early childhood instruction and child care. The SCS allows the qualification level to still be set by appropriations, and then adds a sliding scale up to 45% above the percentage of Federal Poverty Level set by appropriations. The SCS also started with the Quality Rating System language from SB 4 (Charlie Shields), but the QRS language was removed by a committee amendment offered by Sen. Scott Rupp.
2) SCS/SB 175 (Eric Schmitt) to require DESE to produce and distribute a guidance document known as "The Parents' Bill of Rights" for parents of children with an individualized education program.

NO TAX JUSTICE IN "FAIR TAX"

The House Tax Reform Committee approved HCS/HBs 814 & 318 on March 11 by a party-line vote of 7-5. The HCS would eliminate the state income tax and replace it with a state sales tax. The resolution would make Missouri's tax code profoundly less fair, less adequate and less sustainable. Missouri NEA strongly opposes this type of regressive tax change that will keep the Missouri from obtaining the revenue it needs to invest in public schools, public higher education and other vital public services like healthcare.

SENATE DEBATES MORE BUSINESS TAX CREDITS

The Senate began floor debate on SCS/SBs 45 et al. (David Pearce) relating to business tax credits on March 11. SCS/SBs 45 et al. lifts or raises the cap on several business tax credits and reinstates some that have expired. The exact impact of these tax credit changes is unknown, since some currently capped programs, such as the Quality Jobs Program, would no longer have any limit on the amount of tax credits.
The Association strongly urges the legislature to maintain limits on all tax credits and to ensure that all tax credit programs are transparent, properly documented and accountable for meaningful results in return for the public investment of the tax expenditures given.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Call to Action from School Administrators Coalition

HOUSE BUDGET COMMITTEE COMPLETES WORK ON K-12 BUDGET
YOUR ACTION NEEDED

The House Budget Committee completed work this week on HB 2 which is the appropriations bill for elementary and secondary education. The bill is expected to go to the House floor for debate next week. School administrators need to be aware of several issues related to the budget as included in HB 2 and should contact their state representative(s) listed at the bottom of this bulletin to express concerns.
1. HB 2 fully funds the phase-in of the formula for 2009-2010. This assumes a state adequacy target of $6117 and 58% of the funding coming from the new formula and 42% from the old formula. However, it is important to note that over $400 million of federal stabilization money is being used to support the formula. It appears that the legislature is using $400 million in federal stabilization funds to supplant the funding formula in order to provide general revenue funds that can be used for one-time spending programs. When the stimulus money disappears in two years, the general revenue must return to support the formula. Administrators are working with legislative leaders to discuss the possibility of using the one-time funds for school modernization and repair by creating a distribution process that will make these funds available to school districts as quickly as possible with the least amount of red tape.
2. The transportation categorical funding is increased about $14.5 million. Again, about $20 million in federal stimulus funding is being used to support this appropriation. There is a significant concern about what may happen to this funding in two years. This additional funding should keep the transportation reimbursement rate from falling lower than current levels; however, the uncertainty of fuel prices will play a significant role in the 2009-2010 transportation reimbursement rate.
3. The Critical Needs fund is eliminated in HB 2. This is the fund that supports DESE professional development programs including the Regional Professional Development Centers (RPDCs). If these funds are not restored, it likely means the elimination of the RPDCs and may result in a substantial fine by the federal government due to the failure to demonstrate a maintenance of effort for assistance to struggling schools. Please ask your legislator to restore this funding to at least the FY09 levels of $15 million. With over $500 million in stimulus funds for education from the federal government, it appears that ample funds exist at least for the next two years to support the Critical Needs Fund. Administrators should be very vocal about the legislature turning its back on the progress and improvements schools have made through professional development activities in the past 10 years.
4. The budget includes about $24 million in additional funding for Early Childhood Special Education. The source of this funding appears to be Proposition A funds approved by voters in November.
5. HB 2 provides the same level of funding for Career Ladder for FY10 as was included in the FY09 appropriation. One area of concern is that this categorical is being funded by Federal Stimulus funds. Is this an indication that the general assembly only intends to fund career ladder for the next two years? This is a question that legislators need to answer.
6. HB 2 eliminates funding for the Scholar’s Academy, Fine Arts Academy, and Safe Schools grants. There is also a 10% reduction in funding for Parents as Teachers. Your thoughts on these programs need to be communicated to your elected officials.
7. HB 2 reduces funding for virtual schools by $1 million as proposed by the Governor and maintains funding for Career Education at FY09 levels.
8. HB 2 moves funding for the A+ Schools program from DESE to Higher Education. This poses a significant concern about the future of the A+ program.
The bottom line is that there are some significant issues in HB 2 that impact public school funding in FY10 and beyond. It is extremely important that school administrators contact their representative(s) listed to below to express concerns about funding for K-12 education programs

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

MSBA Voices Concern Over TABOR

The following is information posted by the Missouri School Boards' Assocation

HJR 23, commonly known as TABOR (Taxpayers Bill of Rights), is on the House calendar for debate. If passed this constitutional amendment would create an appropriations and revenue growth lid for the state that would be the sum of inflation plus population growth. The measure imposes a strict spending limit and threatens the ability of future legislatures to fund basic state services including elementary and secondary education, health services, higher education and public safety at an adequate level. The legislation slowly erodes the state’s ability to fund critical services and infrastructure needs that not only impacts the quality of life for all Missourians, but also the economic productivity of the state. TABOR is dangerous for Missouri because linking state spending to the inflation rate does not make sense. It does not capture the change in costs for the goods and services the state purchases, nor does it take into account changing population demographics or changes in the need for various services. The current estimates are that using a measure of Missouri population growth plus inflation as this resolution proposes to do would restrict appropriations growth to 2.5 percent to 3 percent per year. Limiting growth to this level will result in significant cuts to the state budget over time. Missouri already has a spending limit in the Hancock Amendment which restricts the growth in state revenue and thereby limits appropriations to the ratio of state appropriations to the level of personal income that existed in 1980. Supporters of the measure say it will keep taxes low and attract business. However, Missouri already has the lowest corporate income tax per capita among states that use this tax and also has numerous business-oriented tax credit programs. The cap on appropriations will not allow Missouri to make improvements in services for residents including for education and transportation infrastructure which are important to the business community. Please call and write your representative and tell him/ her to vote against HJR 23. For a list of representatives and their phone number please go to http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx.